The Subjection of Women

by John Stuart Mill

Overview

2017 Reprint of 1869 Edition. Mill attacks the argument that women are naturally worse at some things than men are and should, therefore, be discouraged or forbidden from doing them. He says that we simply do not know what women are capable of, because we have never let them try – one cannot make an authoritative statement without evidence. We cannot stop women from trying things because they might not be able to do them. An argument based on speculative physiology is just that, speculation. Mills felt that even in societies as unequal as England and the U.S. one could already find evidence that when given a chance women could excel. He pointed to such English queens as Elizabeth I or Victoria, or the French patriot, Joan of Arc. If given the chance women would excel in other arenas and they should be given the opportunity to try.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781684220755
Publisher:	Martino Fine Books
Publication date:	02/21/2017
Edition description:	New Edition
Pages:	108
Product dimensions:	6.14(w) x 9.21(h) x 0.26(d)

About the Author

John Stuart Mill (20 May 1806 - 8 May 1873) was an English philosopher, political economist and civil servant.

Table of Contents

	John Stuart Mill: A Chronology	vii
	Introduction	xi
	A Note on the Text	xxv
	The Subjection of Women	1
Appendix A	Preludes to The Subjection of Women	99
1.	James Mill, Essay on Government (1820)	99
2.	Harriet Taylor, "On Marriage" (1832-33?)	101
Appendix B	Comments by Mill about The Subjection of Women	105
1.	Autobiography, Chapter VII	105
2.	Letters	106
Appendix C	Nineteenth-Century Novelists on the Woman Question	115
1.	Jane Austen, Northanger Abbey (1818)	115
2.	Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist (1837-38)	115
3.	Charlotte Bronte, Jane Eyre (1847)	116
4.	George Eliot, Middlemarch (1871-72)	116
5.	Thomas Hardy, Jude the Obscure (1895)	117
Appendix D	Contemporary Reviews and Critiques	119
1.	W. H. Dixon, Athenaeum	119
2.	Saturday Review	125
3.	Millicent Garrett Fawcett, Fortnightly Review	128
4.	Matthew Browne, Contemporary Review	130
5.	Anne Mozley, Blackwood's Magazine	136
6.	Margaret Oliphant, Edinburgh Review	152
7.	Goldwin Smith, Macmillan's Magazine	163
8.	J.E. Cairnes, Macmillan's Magazine	171
9.	Henry Taylor, Fraser's Magazine	179
10.	Frances Power Cobbe, Theological Review	187
11.	James Fitzjames Stephen, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity	192
Appendix E	Florence Nightingale and Sigmund Freud vs. Mill	205
1.	Cecil Woodham-Smith, Florence Nightingale	205
2.	Ernest Jones, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud	207
	Notes	209
	Select Bibliography	215

Editorial Reviews

"An excellent and affordable edition, with a pithy introduction by Okin that that contextualizes and summarizes the argument well. Mill's work affords insight not only into the issue of women's emancipation, but also into the world of 19th century liberalism: its views of history, of class, and of slavery." --Peter C. Caldwell, Rice University

From the Publisher