Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal
398Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal
398Hardcover
-
PICK UP IN STORECheck Availability at Nearby Stores
Available within 2 business hours
Related collections and offers
Overview
The New Deal fundamentally changed the institutions of American constitutional government and, in turn, the relationship of Americans to their government. Johnathan O'Neill's Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal examines how various types of conservative thinkers responded to this significant turning point in the second half of the twentieth century.
O'Neill identifies four fundamental transformations engendered by the New Deal: the rise of the administrative state, the erosion of federalism, the ascendance of the modern presidency, and the development of modern judicial review. He then considers how various schools of conservative thought (traditionalists, neoconservatives, libertarians, Straussians) responded to these major changes in American politics and culture. Conservatives frequently argued among themselves, and their responses to the New Deal ranged from adaptation to condemnation to political mobilization.
Ultimately, the New Deal pulled American governance and society permanently leftward. Although some of the New Deal's liberal gains have been eroded, a true conservative counterrevolution was never, O'Neill argues, a realistic possibility. He concludes with a plea for conservative thinkers to seriously reconsider the role of Congress—a body that is relatively ignored by conservative intellectuals in favor of the courts and the presidency—in America's constitutional order. Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal explores the scope and significance of conservative constitutional analysis amid the broader field of American political thought.
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9781421444628 |
---|---|
Publisher: | Johns Hopkins University Press |
Publication date: | 11/29/2022 |
Pages: | 398 |
Sales rank: | 538,515 |
Product dimensions: | 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 1.28(d) |
Age Range: | 18 Years |
About the Author
Table of Contents
AcknowledgmentsIntroduction: Varieties of American Conservatism after the New Deal Part I. The Administrative State: An OverviewChapter 1. Traditionalists, Neoconservatives, Libertarians, and the Administrative StateChapter 2. Straussians, the Administrative State, and the Rise of the Unitary Executive, Part 1Part II. The Erosion of Federalism: An OverviewChapter 3. Traditionalists, Neoconservatives, and the Erosion of FederalismChapter 4. Libertarians and the Erosion of FederalismChapter 5. Straussians and the Erosion of FederalismPart III. The Modern Presidency: An OverviewChapter 6. Traditionalists, the Modern Presidency, and the Rise of the Unitary Executive, Part 2Chapter 7. Straussians, Neoconservatives, Libertarians, and the Modern Presidency Part IV. Modern Judicial Review: An OverviewChapter 8. Traditionalists, Neoconservatives, and Modern Judicial ReviewChapter 9. Straussians and Modern Judicial ReviewChapter 10. Libertarians and Modern Judicial Review: Toward the Imperative of LitigationConclusion: Conservatives, Congress, and the Future of American ConstitutionalismNotesIndexWhat People are Saying About This
Johnathan O'Neill offers an impressive and comprehensive intellectual map of constitutional conservatives' responses to the New Deal. An essential history for those who seek to understand twentieth- and twenty-first-century conservative constitutional and political thought.
Johnathan O'Neill has written an important book, one we have needed for a long time: a carefully focused examination of how conservative thinkers have responded to the four principal challenges of the post-New Deal political and constitutional environment. Essential reading for scholars of all political and constitutional persuasions.—Wilfred McClay, Hillsdale College
The Constitution is too important to be left to the lawyers, or even the political theorists. In this exemplary work of careful, balanced scholarship, Johnathan O'Neill shows why a fuller understanding of constitutionalism requires historians, and especially historians who take ideas seriously. This is essential reading for every serious student of American conservatism and American constitutionalism.—Yuval Levin, American Enterprise Institute
Johnathan O'Neill offers an impressive and comprehensive intellectual map of constitutional conservatives' responses to the New Deal. An essential history for those who seek to understand twentieth- and twenty-first-century conservative constitutional and political thought.—Vincent Phillip Muñoz, Director, Center for Citizenship & Constitutional Government, University of Notre Dame
Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal is a first-rate book that reflects a careful reading of conservative intellectual debates. Although there has been growing attention to modern conservative thought within constitutionalism, the book breaks new ground while highlighting and clarifying fissures within conservative constitutional thought.—Keith E. Whittington, author of Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present
Johnathan O'Neill has written an important book, one we have needed for a long time: a carefully focused examination of how conservative thinkers have responded to the four principal challenges of the post-New Deal political and constitutional environment. Essential reading for scholars of all political and constitutional persuasions.
Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal is a first-rate book that reflects a careful reading of conservative intellectual debates. Although there has been growing attention to modern conservative thought within constitutionalism, the book breaks new ground while highlighting and clarifying fissures within conservative constitutional thought.
The Constitution is too important to be left to the lawyers, or even the political theorists. In this exemplary work of careful, balanced scholarship, Johnathan O'Neill shows why a fuller understanding of constitutionalism requires historians, and especially historians who take ideas seriously. This is essential reading for every serious student of American conservatism and American constitutionalism.